Monty Sloan Wolf Hybrid Poster Page 3

 

Misrepresentation of wolf content

    It can be said that the majority of wolf hybrids are misrepresented as to the amount of wolf in the animal. Although an accurate survey of this would be difficult to make, perhaps impossible, general experiences of most individuals working with hybrids all come to a similar conclusion — that somewhere on the order of 75% – 90% of wolf hybrids have a lower wolf content than is claimed by the owner.

Explanations for this are:

  • Economics – The more wolf a hybrid supposedly contains, the more it is valued and hence, the more money it, or its offspring, can bring a breeder.
  • Ego – The more wolf a hybrid supposedly contains, the more personal value many owners place on the animal. Others who may not care what percentage their animal is may find it difficult to come to terms with having been “taken” by the breeder.
  • Ignorance – Most hybrid owners have only experienced and worked with dogs (in their personal experience with canines.) Such experience will often lead people to see and exaggerate all the “differences” that exist between wolves and dogs, and not to see the similarities. In essence, most people see what they want to believe — that their animal exhibits very “wolf-like” characteristics. Objectivity seems rare in people who own hybrids.

Even where the pedigree is accurate, some consideration to the following needs to be made:

  • Variability is inevitable, and with hybrids this can lead to differing breeding success. Dogs, like all domesticated animals, are more fertile than their wild counterparts. Male wolves are only fertile from around early December to around early April, while male dogs are fertile year round. Female wolves give birth to only one small litter per year in the spring. Female dogs often give birth to larger litters, and many can breed twice a year.
  • Wolves are less suited for a life in captivity, whereas dogs have been selectively bred to live with man. Hybrids which are more “wolf-like” are generally less adapted to pet situations. They, usually have shorter life-spans and overall are more stressed than the more “dog-like” animals. “Wolf-like” hybrids are also more likely to “get into trouble” through difficulty in containment, more intense predatory behavior and social aggression, greater need for intensive socialization, and difficulty with medical care. There is also a greater ease in identification of more “wolf-like” hybrids by neighbors and authorities where ownership of such animals is regulated or prohibited.
  • The combination of higher fertility and overall better adaptation to a captive environment for the more dog-like animals may play a role in creating multi-generation hybrids which are more uniformly dog-like in general appearance and behavior.

Misrepresentation of expectations

    Breeders and owners often make claims of how wonderful hybrids are to keep as pets. Claims are made that hybrids are good in the house, great with children, and basically “just like dogs.” Although this is possibly true of low wolf-content hybrids, it is not true with most, certainly not all. Regardless, glorifying hybrids as great pets does the animals a disservice and jeopardizes animals as well as those around them. Even a good breeder of pedigreed dogs would do their best to talk a prospective owner out of purchasing a puppy. This is common practice done by breeders of any animal who want to ascertain the readiness of a future owner for any and all problems which might arise.

Although it may not be possible to make any precise assessment of an animal’s wolf or dog content, consider the following: It is possible through visual examination to tell a pure wolf from a pure dog. No dog looks just like a wolf. No wolf looks just like a dog. With experience, it is even possible to make an educated guess as to whether an animal is very much like a wolf, or very much like a dog, or somewhere in between. However, you can’t always tell by just looking, if an animal is a high content wolfdog or a pure wolf. You can’t always tell if an animal is a low content wolf or a dog. Some mid-range animals will even exhibit characteristics which do not correspond to their pedigree. These concepts are important to keep in mind when looking through the following images.

Half sisters


figure026

Figure 26

Figure 26 shows two animals, half sisters, which share the same mother. The animal on the left was reported to be in the 90% wolf range, while the animal on the right was reportedly only a little less wolf, being in the 80% wolf range.

The animal on the left was very wolf-like in every respect; the animal on the right was very dog-like. The mother was reportedly a hybrid in the 90% range, but considering the resultant offspring (on the right), the father in that case was most likely misrepresented in percentage. The mother as well as the father of the animal on the right were seen by the author and both looked much like pure wolves. The breeder claimed the father of the animal on the left was no longer alive, nor were there any photographs….

“Wolves” without wolf


figure027

Figure 27

Figures 27-30 are all animals which were grossly misrepresented. They were all purchased as high wolf-content animals, but nothing about them was overtly wolf-like at all. They were “wolves” without wolf in them — an all too common occurrence.

figure028

Figure 28

The animals in figures 27 and 28 were both brought out to Wolf Park for our “opinion” as to what they were. Both were purchased as “75%” wolf, but no wolf-like characteristics could be seen in either animal.

The animals in figure 29 were purchased for $500.00 each from a breeder who advertises nationally. The owner visited, and video taped, the parents of the pups before the pups were born. In the video, the parents looked like pure wolves. Such “token” wolves on the premises of some breeders are well known. Such breeders can sell at an inflated price both low-content wolfdogs and mutt dogs obtained wherever they can find them. These two animals were supposed to be “pure wolves,” but note the shepherd markings, stocky build, long ears on the animal on the right and the floppy ears on the animal on the left! These animals had little wolf in them.

The problem with misrepresented animals is that they give their owners a false sense of experience with owning hybrids.
figure029

Figure 29

Many breeders try to enhance their animals with stories of rare and exotic wolf in their background. Often these claims are for impossible animals such as “Alaskan red wolves,” “Russian Turukhan wolf,” or an all-time favorite the “Louisiana swamp wolf.”

figure030

Figure 30

Pictured in figure 30 the highly endangered and rare “Russon wolf.” [sic] The owner of this animal was told that these animals were driven to extinction in the wild near the turn of the century and they now only existed in captivity. They were never documented, so if anybody, especially a wildlife official, biologist or other “scientist” were to tell her otherwise, she was not to listen for such people did not know what they were talking about! Not only did she believe this story, but she was also breeding this animal with neighborhood dogs creating “hybrids” which were of course a bit lacking in the wolf department.

figure031

Figure 31

Misrepresented animals, where little to no wolf exists, are of course quite likely to be good in the house, make great companions, need relatively little work, be relatively easy to contain, and so on.

The problem with these misrepresented animals is not the animals themselves, but what sometimes happens when a person gets the real thing. The owner might think they have experience and can handle the animal, but when problems arise, they may not ask for help because they “can handle it themselves.” Some people have even gone through several high content animals, thinking that the animals were “defective” in some way because they were so shy, so defensive, so impossible to handle, so… well, so wild!

figure032

Figure 32

Figures 31-33 are Noah, a wolf owned by a woman who had animals that she thought were “50%” wolf in San Francisco, California. These animals were excellent pets. They showed no wolf-like characteristics and probably had no wolf in them at all.

figure033

Figure 33

She acquired Noah because she felt that he would be an excellent pet. She also planned on breeding him to her other animals. When he was only six months old, he was identified by the authorities as a wolf and confiscated. Although he ended up at Wolf Haven, an excellent facility in the state of Washington, his previous experiences with people ill-trained to handle wolves and hybrids led him to distrust people. He remained quite shy, but was able to live out a life in relative comfort. He has been one of the fortunate few which found a safe home.


Introduction
Identification
Percentages
Misrepresentation
Quality of Life
Social Testing & Predation
Socialization & Medical Care
Are Wolves and Hybrids Trainable?
Legislation & Health Care
The Press
Why Have A Wolf or Wolfdog?
References